Geocentrism & The Micro Macrocosm

Geocentrism & The Micro Macrocosm

When I first began exploring the flat earth material, one of the things I struggled with was how the concept of a micro macrocosm could be weaved in with a geocentric cosmology.

After all, I had come to believe that the spinning principle is repeated throughout the Universe,

so what would that mean if we lived on a flat earth? That the micro macrocosm concept was wrong?

I had come to believe that the 'planets' were spinning around the sun in the same way that electrons spin around the atoms and that perhaps this process repeats its self to infinity.

So if this wasn't the case, then was the concept of a micro macrocosm still a thing I asked myself?

I began to consider that there must be a pattern that repeats its self throughout the so called Universe, but perhaps in a different way from what we have been taught.

I thought about how everything in nature has a container. Our cells are contained by a cell wall, and our organs are contained by the fascia, and a developing fetus is contained within a womb. Then throughout our life hopefully, we are protected from the elements by some kind of shelter. 

 How is it then that when we step out of our doors into the outside world, that we can be walking on the outside of a ball that is exposed to an infinite Universe with no container?! When I started to look at it in this way, it seemed ridiculous and did not look like a system could support life.

I began to consider that the micro macrocosm principle would make more sense if it was the container that repeated its self rather than the spinning atoms or so called planets. This would lean towards the idea that life is not an accident and that we are blessed a certain level of protection. 

 This of course is the complete opposite of what we are taught in the Big Bang/ Evolution Theory, which basically teaches us that life came about through a big explosion followed by a series of accidents and mutations. Where is the room for a divine intelligence in this model? There isn't one.

Ancient Cosmology's

When I began looking at some of the ancient cosmological models, I could see how at a glance, they could easily be mistaken for Globes. When we study them in more detail however, we see that

what they all have in common, it that they all depict some kind of a container, with a flat land mass inside that container.

I started to hypothesise that perhaps the earths land mass could be contained inside a cell, or a womb, or like the ancients depicted, a cosmic egg of some kind. This is all of course speculation, but I think it's OK to speculate.

Also, when we consider that humans are primarily visual learners, and that we have been programmed with globe symbology since infancy, for many of us, we need to have a visual representation of how things might work, even if it's not entirely accurate not scientifically proven, just so that we can open up our minds to other ways of thinking.

Some people have suggested that the electro magnetic fields from the stars and wondering stars above us imprint the leylines below us in perfect geometry.

Either way, there is evidence of divine intelligence everywhere we look, and whichever model we adhere to if any, we can only stand in awe at it all and be mesmorised by its beauty and wonder.